Blog

Bhoodan Movement

Bhoodan Movement (land gift mission started in 1951)

Acharya Vinoba Bhave

Vinoba was a faithful disciple of Gandhi.

Studied Sanskrit, Persian, Urdu, Hindi, Marathi, Guajarati, Bengali, Telugu, Kanarese,

Malayalam and English.

Preached in many places: “walked from one to another of India’s  700,000, villages, he

asks those  who have land to share it with those who have none.”

It is more blessed to give than to receive.

I have come to loot your love

Vinoba called his campaign as ‘Bhoomidan Yagna’

He walked 6500 miles, distributed more than a million (thousand thousands) acres of land to the poor.

Largest single gift was 100,000 acres from a Maharaja.

Not all the gifts are prompted by charitable impulse (violence of communism).

Except communists, all parties accepted Raja Vinoba’s method.

Bhoodan has given pride of ownership to hundreds of thousands.

Vinoba was a Brahmin, born in 1895 in Maharastra.

His original name was Vinayak but Gandhi changed into Vinoba.

At ten he took to lifelong celibacy. He practiced yoga for forty years.

At 20 he was shipped off to study at Bombay, but went to Bengal and joined the national

movement.

Vinoba was a sick man (ulcer and malaria)

He first saw Gandhi in 1916.

Gandhi invited him to his ashram in Sabarmati. Gandhi himself sat and wrote letter to

Vinoba’s father

In 1932  he was first arrested for taking part in Gandhi’s civil disobedience movement.

The bhoomidan movement was born in bloody Telungana 91951).

(3000 killed, 35000 jailed, before government troops restored order)

Almost about 35,000 acres were collected and reassigned to the most destitute.

He walked almost 10-12 miles a day.

3 a.m., he and his disciples singing hymns , moved from one village to the other. Of course some go early and prepare things.

He used to meditate for an hour.

His ashram is in Puanar in Madhya Pradesh.

Nehru wanted him to come to Delhi and discuss Bhoomidan woth the national planning commission.

When in Bihar  he was seized with acute malaria (from 1952).

He collected 365000 acres of land in Bihar he respected the scriptures of all the faiths.

People called him babaji (little grandfather). Gandhi Bapu- father.

Vinoba’s policy was based on village whereas Nehru’s is development policy.

Sarvodaya- rise of all/ welfare of all

It was a principle of Gandhi. Democracy guarantees the welfare of the majority and not all.

But savodaya is based on a spiritual foundation. Its means also was spiritual.

The foundations of Sarvodaya are: satya, ahimsa, brahmachariya, dhariya

swaparityaga.

The goal of sarvodaya was to build a society without exploitation.

The education system should be skill oriented. No doubt education gives liberation, but job oriented education is helpful.

Often highly educated people are not creative.

There should be elementary education for seven years.

People should pay the expense of education through work.

Higher education should be a concern of private.

In economy everyone should get equal opportunity. And there should be help to the needy.

The land belongs to God

Cooperative cultivation is good.

Vinoba followed Gandhi.

Muhammad Iqbal

Sir Muhammad Iqbal
Between 1876 and 1938, born in Kashmir (Sialkot).
Iqbal was a poet-philosopher.
For him there was interaction of political nationalism with religious nationalism in Islam.
It was exemplified in the life and thought of iqbal.
 He is considered as the ‘spiritual founder of Pakistan’.
His poems (next to Koran) influenced the intelligentsia of Pakistan.
 His poems kindled the Muslims the value of Islam.
He was not interested in politics.
 He had deep feeling for the unity of the Islamic world.
He had great concern for the future of Muslims in India.
He wrote in Urdu, Persian and English
His six lectures delivered (between 1928 and 1929) in India and elsewhere,  titled the reconstruction of religious thought in Islam, created greatest impact.
Nietzsche’s superman was a source of his poetic inspiration.
Iqbal was against undisciplined individualism (western capitalism)
He was against nationalism and preferred religious nationalism.
According to Islam:
Man is the vice-regent of God on earth.
World salvation is possible only by coming closer to quranic  teaching.
He wanted Islamic unity and solidarity- universal Muslim brotherhood.
For him territorial nationalism is root of all social evils
His superman is the one who follows the commandment of one supreme power.
Democracy was abhorrent to him.
The keynote of his philosophy is  the development of personality, which he asserts can best be realized by ‘going back to the quran’.
He denounced inactivity and aloofness from the world of the Sufi saints and mystics
His ideal man will not be absorbed in God, but absorb the qualities of God. Overcomes the world. And save mankind.
Iqbal was dynamism’s chief spokesman.
He said a dynamic infidel is more righteous than a passive Muslim.
He called for social and moral reconstruction.

JAMAAT-E-ISLAMI HIND

JAMAAT-E-ISLAMI HIND

Introduction

The social classes in the Muslim community, elitist character of the Indian politics and the domination in the political arena have given birth to a number of Muslim political parties and groups. These organizations are partly religious and partly  political. For them religion   is the source of their ideology and political    program. It is the biggest          
integral element of the so- called identity of the community.
        After Independence the Muslims were left with two Alternatives  -quasi-secular approach of Maulnna Azad, and the communal approach of the fundamentalists. Maulana Azad and others were exhorting the members of their community to avoid communalism and Join the     national political parties. They also believed that the political and economic unity shall bring the various communities together and help in establishing a  secular and democratic society, ensuring necessary cultural and religious freedom to all the minority groups. The burden of the argument was that the Muslims might have separate            cultural and social organizations but in the political field their identity should be merged with the larger national identity.
M. Shakir points out that, this leadership had its limitations and weaknesses because at the mass level it could not bridge the gulf between fundamentalism and secular· political attitudes. It had no courage to implement elementary reforms in the religious and social system of the community. Therefore ·the increasingly alienation of the leaders with the people made them quite ineffective.
The fundamentalists took the maximum advantage of the limitations of the socalled “nationalist” Muslim leadership.
A question may be asked here, what are the prospects of any Muslim party/group, based on religion in a predominantly non ­Muslim society? The arguments of the fundamentalists  are quiet interesting, ‘notwithstanding the communal aggressiveness   of the Hindus, India has always been a religious, moral and spiritual country. We the ·people of India have urge for spiritualism and truth.  
Even after the technological and scientific developments, we are not devoid of religiosity and spiritualism. There has been a legacy of preaching Islam in this country right from the early days of Islam. The Muslim traders, and the religious leers like Khwaja Moinuddin Chisti, have been converting thousands of the Hindus to Islam. It is possible even today. It is also argued that the people of this country have chosen a democratic path. Democracy and democratic path are conducive to a drastic change, a revolution, without shedding blood and without violence. Now a revolution is possible with the change of outlook and change of opinion. It means    that Islamic movement        has a bright    ·future in India.
There are number of Muslim political parties and groups, some of them operate at the regional level and some on the national level.
 Here in this paper we deal with the Jamaat-e-Islami which is a staunch fundamentalist group and operates at the national level.
we shall make an attempt to cover the beginning and the objectives of the Jamaat, the structure of Jamaat, the Jamaat and secularism and the Jamaat and politics.
The Beginning and the Objective of the Jamaat:
The Jamaat-e- Islam (here after the Jamaat) was established in August 1941 by Maulana Abul Mau-doodi (19031979) on his initiatives seventy-fivepersons assembled at  Lahore. There were among them the Ulema, (head of the Muslim community), University graduates, artisans, and professional men. The objective of the Jamaat was the establishment of “Deen”(Religion) which meant .the revival of Islamic values and ideals

 in the life of the people. What was implied in it was the rejection of socialism, democracy, nationalism and secularism.  Maudoodi maintained that the

Western notion of democracy, fascist regimentation and Turkeys deviation from Islam were not satisfactory conditions at all. The only ideal state is the Islamic theocracy. Maudoodi opposed the Indian National Congress and the Musim Leagues policies. 
 In Maudoodi’s view the programs of both the Muslim league and the Indian National Congress represented a non-Islamic emphasis on Nationalism and were counter to Islam. Nationalism, whether that proposed by the league or the congress was a selfish principle that was prohibited by Islam and the people who espoused the nationalist cause  were leading Muslims away from the legitimate goal of a truly Islamic society based on universal principles. As a whole he did not agree with the methods and objectives of the national movement. But after the partition of the country, Maudoodi., moved to Pakistan and indulged in worst kind of opportunism in the public life of the country, all in the name of  Quran and Hadith.
 A separate Jamaat-eIslami Hind was established in April 1948 with Maulana Abul Lais Islahi as its Ameer (Chief). However independence and partition of the                 country did not bring about any change in the policy and character o   f Jamaat.   
What is the root cause of the ills of the contemporary society? According to the Jamaat, it is materialism and      this worldliness. The present social structure is without any ethical foundations. What is needed is a religious revolution and an awakening of the religious consciousness of the people such      a revolution can be brought about by the righteous Muslims who constitute the Kahir-e-ummat (the chosen– virtuous among the people).They are a symbol of goodness  and are blessed with divine light. The Muslims, therefore, are       not a community or a minority or a geographical          entity but by superseding them constitute into a party-the party  of God, Hizbullah.
According to Jamaat a society based on materialism produce a civilization which forcibly separates religion from the state and society. In the non-Western world it has created      a slavish mentality. The West            and Western  civilization have crated
the false gods of nationalism and democracy. Nationalism is nothing but national selfishness.  It treats man as not as part of humanity but as a member of particular country set against other countries. Maudoodi held that freedom struggle which motivated by the philosophy of nationalism was not righteous. Because the Indian National Congress was political1yIndian, ideologically communist and culturally Western. Since the congress was manned by  the revivalists and communists both are dangerous to Islam and the Muslims.
                Democracy is undesirable because it            considers people as sovereign, while as Islam says God alone can be sovereign. Also it believes in
the existence of different political parties. Islamic polity can permit only one party. Besides adult franchise and political participation in democracy are prohibited by religion. In the same way socialism was opposed to Islam as it abolishes property and it is atheistic.
                Against this background of the philosophy of the Jamaat le us analyze its role in Indian politics. The Jamaat in India has to                         
function in a different social and political set up. In Pakistan, the Muslims are in majority whereas in India they are in minority. India, after independence did not become a Hindu. Country but was declared to be secular one. The Indian  constitution provided for democracy with adult franchise and equal rights for all. This should have been unpalatable to Jamaat. What Maudoodi said before the court of inquiry in Pakistan is quiet relevant here. The question was, if we have our idea of Islamic Government herein Pakistan, will you permit Hindus to have their constitution on the basis of their own religion? Answer, certainly, I should have no objection,· even if  the Muslims in India are treated in that form of Government as Shudras and malechhas and Manu’s laws are applied to them depriving them of all shares in the Government and the rights of citizen. I n fact such a state of affairs already exists in India.
The question, what will be the duty of the Muslims in India in case of war between India and Pakistan? Answer, Their duty is obvious, and that
is not to fight against Pakistan, or to do anything injurious to the safety of Pakistan.
It goes to the credit of the Jamaat that it adopted a flexible attitude. And successfully established itself as one of the important parties of the Muslim community. The immediate problem resulting from partition was the effect of the Muslim League’s politics and exchange of population.  The Jamaat counseled and it worked for the restoration of confidence among the Muslims who had been totally demoralized. It advised them to have faith in God and they should not despair about their future. The Muslims were also told that the real field of work was the land of their birth.
The Structure of the Jamaat
The Jamaat is a rigidly organized and well disciplined party.  Though it is essentially composed of the middleclass, lately it has made a successful bid to gain the support of all the sections of the Muslims. This is particularly true among the students and the womenfolk. Its influence should not be judged by its meager membership.  In1967 it claimed to 1360 members, in1974 the number rose to 2064, in1980 it has reached the figure of 2833, and at present they have 5,683 members. The Jamaat disclaims large membership.  In fact the Jamaat has   a          graded hierarchy       of the   membership structure. They are adherents (arkan),supporters    (Maweneen), those    who      agree (muttafaqeen)

-‘

and those who       are      influenced  (muttasinn).    The strength            of the muttafaqeen is 2232 and of the        manawaneen is 46,272. The Jamaat           has 23 regionl organization centers in most of the states including Andaman, in all the Jamaat has 436 local units.

            The Jamaat has 648      libraries and 488 reading rooms. Throughout the country. It runs 45 nursery schools, 285   schools, 40j  unior high schools and 26 colleges.(This current Data has been collected from the Jammat Branch office – “Dawat Ijitima”, Hyderabad).. In addition to this the  Jamaat publishes a vast.literature pertaining to Islam and Hadith, not only in English and Urdu but also in different regional languages. The Jamaat also .have English weekly called the “Radiance” and Marathi weekly Called “Margadeep”. The president is Maulana Abdul Aziz.·
The Jamaat and Secularism
The Jama.at according to its constitution is a “Peaceful, non communal party working democratically for a moral and spiritual reorientation of outlook”. The Constitution of the Jamaat further states that I slam (Deen)” encompasses            the exterior and interior of     man as well as individual and social aspects of life. There is not       even a single  aspect of human life ranging from  beliefs, devotional works,        and morals     to economic, social .and political aspects which  may be beyond     its pale. Just as this Deen is a, guarantee for divine pleasure and success in the hereafter, so ·it is also the most excellent system of life for the proper solution of worldly problems and righteous and progressive construction of individual and social life is possible only through its establishment”.
This approach of the Jamaat shows that it aim at providing an Islamic orientation to the Problems of the Muslim community as well as of the country. It desires to have a society in which the values of democracy, non communal nationalism and secularism will have no place.  In India, the Jamaat believes, democracy shall not ensure justice to the minorities  because there are permanent religious majority and permanent religious minorities. The question of sovereignty is also crucial. Sovereignty of God and of the people cannot go hand  in hand. Elections, parties, law making power of the legislative bodies are all alien to Islam.
(This is a questionable stand of Jamaat).
        The Indian situation, according to the Jamaat, is characterized by immorality,
dishonesty, corruption, inefficiency in short moral degeneration. It is because of nationalism. The duty of the Muslim is to discard the notion of nationalism. They should not think in terms of their national rights”. They should give up the idea of pressurizing the political parties because it will be of no benefit to them.
             The Jamaat believes that Muslims participation in the growth of secularism is   “treachery to the Prophet”. Islam cannot be separated from politics.  Secularism is nothing but “irreligiousness“. In one ofthe statements the former chief of the Jamaat Maulana Abul Lais Islahi said,         “we do  not deny the value and                                     worth of some of the slogans of the Mahasabha.  For example, it is against secularism and supports the incorporation of the religious              ethical values in the political:life of the people. Similar has been the attitudes of the Jamaat  towards the Arya Samaj and the R.S.S.During the emergency   the leaders     of the Jamaat and the R.S.S. found that they could work together.
       According to Maulana Mohammad Yusuf the then chief of the Jamaat “The physical proximity enabled them to understand each others point of view,                 what was more, it started the normalization of relations between different communities. This should be encouraged in order to improve the  social climate     in the country.” Further the Maulana admitted that “the role of R.S.S. in the past could not have been to the liking of the Muslims. However the responsible leaders of RSS are now adopting non-communal attitude. One does not know what he really meant because in the constitution of the Jamaat the non-communal nationalism has no place.
But on the basis of the writings of the leaders of both the-:organizations it is  not difficult to  believe that the basis of unity between them was already there. Each considered the other as the authentic representative of its community .Anti-secularism and anti-communalism is common to both. Both favor the separate religio-political organizations of the different communities. Both of them resort to violence for their religious stand, and for opposing the communist movement in the country.
       The Jamaat is especially concentrating its activities in the Kashmir valley. It is said that when the whole country protested the execution of Bhutto by the military regime of Pakistan, the Jamaat-e-Islamic had the audacity to distribute sweets.
          In the year 1990 when Advani’s Rath Yatra began the Jamaat had intensified its activities in the name of protecting the mosque. Their activities are not confined to propaganda alone they have  started physical assault on the innocent people of other communities the result was a bloodshed.
In December last year they organized an attack on the Shiv Sena and other communal parties.  Some of their leaders using mosques, instigated the people to kill, which according to them is justifiable under their interpretation of Islam, but which also consequently led to the ban on the  Jamaat by the Government of India.
Now suddenly in the  last month Jamaat-e-Islami started anti-liquor agitation  in Anantnag (Kashmir Valley) town which led to the looting of shops of the minority community spoiling the slow progress of the communal peace in the town. Everybody  knows that the Jamaat-e-Tulba student wing of the Jamaat-e-Islami was behind the trouble.
The Jamaat also gone to the extent of organizing squads of their toughs to launch physical attacks.  Some time they are even armed. To put it in a nutshell to the Jamaat the secularism is nothing but an irreligiousness which is against Islam.
The Jamaat and Politics
In the political field Jamaat lays emphasis on three principles to be followed by Indian       Muslims.
           Solidarity of the Muslims on the basis of Islam.
Withdrawal from the political activities in the country.
          A separate political organization of the Muslims.                                                                        
First the Jamaat feels that      the solidarity based on Islam ··alone can be permanent  and stable.  Its hall make the community strong enough to fight the enemies of God from within and from outside. Its hall constitute a force against the present system which denies he existence of God and life after death. It also means that
Muslims should not Join any other organizations  and parties because its spells dis-organization and disaster.
           Secondly, .according      to Jamaat the Muslims should not participate in        the elections. They should not cast their vote also. It amounts to indulging in unIslamic activity. Not only the Elections but the entire democratic system is an imitation of the “Godless-West”. Non-participation in the election shall ensure the maintenance of Islamic identity. Maulana Abul Lais Islahi points out many practical difficulties in the context of India. They are “the Muslim candidates cannot
secure the votes of the Hindus, unless .   they seek the support of other political parties. But this is not possible because every Indian believe .in the     onenation theory”.
Such an alliance shall disable the Muslim representatives to act as protectors of the legitimate interests of the whole Muslim community. If one decides to follow the discipline of a political party, one ceases to be the master of his own will.             
It is also argued by the Jamaait that the Hindus want to establish a state in keeping with the veda and Dharmshastras and want to emerge as a Hindu nation. Once the Muslims become the actual participants in the election politics of India, they may be “irretrievably caught in the whirl of  party politics and may not remain as mindful of their religious duty towards their Country as they ought to be”. It should  be noted that in the Seventies ,this stance of the Jamaat underwent a change. In1962 it accepted the utility of elections. It held that they (elections) are the best way to contact with public relations and Muslims by such contact, can create on the affairs of the nation the impact they want to. So in1972 it decided to take part in the Panchayat elections as a first step for participating in the higher electoral bodies. In advising to participate and not to participate in the elections the Jamaat always has “Islamic” arguments to convince the Muslims.
Thirdly, the Jamaat believes that the Muslims as a religious community and an important political entity should have a separate political organization. It has been working in this direction right from the early fifties but succeeded only in the sixties. With the formation of the Majlis-e-Musawarat, the Jamaat got a great opportunity to provide religious orientation to a number of issues in Muslim politics and operate as a   strong pressure group. The Jamaat acted with a calculated strategy and it had the desired results. 
      The failure of the nationalist muslim leadership, the claim autonomous status of the
 Minority was also failure. Therefore, the policy of seeking   “protection”       and “safeguards” could not be very  effective. So the Jamaat offered the alternatives     that   Muslims should accept   
and practice the  .injunctions of Islam, where lies    their salvation. The Muslims were asked not to prefer the    joint  organization of the different communities. One of the         organs, the Radiance Weekly, of      the Jamaat  wrote that “there .   should be                    separate    and strong organizations  of  the Hindus, the          Muslins,   the Sikhs the Buddhists ,and others. None should try to wean away the members of another. Hindu Muslim unity cannot beachieved by  setting up joint organization      of the  two   religious communities. Every religious community should have a separate political organization and every issue should be decided by the              representatives of the communities by holding mutual  talks. Not only this, the Jamaat advised the national secular parties not to approach the Muslim
 masses directly. Those Muslims who belong to these parties are not “the representatives of the Millat” (community).  The Mushawarat was not a single organization of the Muslims.        But the Jamaat  leadership was quite enthusiastic about its formation and growth. The reasons appear to be that it wanted to get broader mass base and to use Muslim consolidation as a counter with any political party like the Congress or Bharatiya Janata Party.
Summary
In theory we have seen that the Jamaat is very conservative, and anti-secularist but in practice the Jamaat betrays conservatism and seeks political opportuniom. The Islamic Idiom is only a mask, Religion isbeing used in order to support reactionary politics, mention has already been made of the Jamaats attitude towards the Ary Samaj, R.S.S. and so on.
.Also we have       seen throughout          the paper   a kind                of double standard and sudden shifts in its philosophy for example, the Jamaat

.

     and the demand for Bangla Desh. According to the Jamnat, the demand was contrary to Islamic brotherhood and Muslim solidarity. Further Muslims cannot be divided on the basis of language and region. But when the movement succeeded the Jamaat advised the Bangla leaders to establish an Islamic rule in BanglaDesh. The Jamaat’s hold on the Muslims should be viewed with grave concern. It is giving birth to a combination of Islamic fundamentalism and uncompromising hostility to secularism\democracy. It is promoting anti-historical consciousness and reactionary socio-political and economic outlook in ·the Muslim country.

Gandhi

Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
He was a great apostle of truth and non-violence.
He was the architect of India’s freedom
Father of the Nation(Assassinated in 1948).
He released flood of spiritual energy.
His  moral standards were very high.
He  made the common people to resist injustice and tyranny in high places.
He resisted the  governments of South Africa and England.
He was not a mere political leader or a social reformer.
First and foremost, he was a man of God, saint, sannyasi.
Birth
Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi was born at Porbandar, Kathiawar In Gujarat, on the 2nd October 1869.
Education
He joined in 1887 at Samaldas College at Bhavnagar, left after one term.
Sent to England to study law.
Took three oaths leaving for England: will not touch wine, woman and meat.
He was married at the age of 18.
Sailed to England on 4th September 1887.
He learned there Latin, French and English.
Passed the London matriculation.
Called to Bar on 10th June 1891.
While in England read Bhagavad Gita, Light of Asia, NT, Heroes and Hero worship (Carlyle)
Returned to India in 1891. Did not find suitable job.
Worked with Dada Abdullah& Co in South Africa.  Went there for one year but continued for long time.
In south Africa Indian population gave him their legal work.
Did free public  service.
Applied to be advocate of the Supreme Court and got.
 In south Africa and England he laid before the governments the grievances of the Indians living in south   Africa.
And he organized the “Natal Indian Congress” on May 2, 1894.
He set up his practice in Johannesburg in 1903.
He raised politics to the level of religion.
He worked for Swaraj for India.
He also said that he preferred Truth to Swaraj.
For him Truth was God.
There was perfect harmony between Gandhi’s life and teaching
He was the author of Satyagraha and an ideal Sathyagrahi.
He was also a man of Action, “Ideal Karma Yogin”.
His spiritual foundation is derived from Ishopanishad v1: “ All this , whatsoever moves on earth is pervaded by the Lord. When thou hast surrendered all this, then thou mayest enjoy.  Do not covet the wealth of any man.”
 Basics ideas are: faith in God, surrender to His will, brotherhood of all, renunciation and service.
For him Truth was God.
God is not a mere abstract idea, but a living presence.
He said if you cut of mu limbs I will not die but “ blast my belief in God and I am dead.”
He called God, the mysterious being, as Sat.
Move from God is truth is to truth is God.
To Know God is to attain self realization. Truth can be perceived in different ways and therefore there is no need for force.
Also perfect non-violence is necessary for us in our search for Truth.
Ahimsa and truth are so intertwined that it is difficult to disentangle and separate them.
Ahimsa is the means and truth is the end.
Hinduism is a relentless pursuit after Truth.
Non-violence is not mere non-killing.
Every act of giving pain to the mind or the body of any living creatures directly or indirectly is a breach of ahimsa.
Gandhi’s gospel of truth and non-violence is based on his faith that God is love as well as truth.
Caste system: Gandhi believed that modern caste system in India is a travesty of the Varnashramadharma and is a breach of the doctrine of ahimsa.
For Gandhi the theory of Varna is based on
            Spiritual economy
            Division of labor
            The principle of heredity
            The equality and oneness of all  life.
For Gandhi all professions should be on an equal footing.
He also said if both Hinduism and India are to live and grow from day-today caste should go away.
His campaign against Untouchability was his biggest contribution to Hinduism.
In contrast to the industrialized West Gandhi believed in village economy.
Swadeshi is swadharma applied to one’s immediate environment.
Gandhi spiritualized economics and politics.
He extended swadeshi to economics, education, politics and religion.
 The struggle for Swaraj is an all round awakening – social, educational, moral , economic and political.
Education should be in mother tongue. Along with other basic crafts.
All should retain their own religion.
He was emphatically against the proselytizing activities of the Christian missionaries.
All religions are branches of the tree of Truth.
At the same time all religions are imperfect because they have come through human channels.
Religion is bet propagated by the noble lives led by its followers.
It is not mere toleration but believing that all faiths lead to the same goal.
He said child marriage, enforced widowhood and the devadasi system are as much blots on Hindu society as untouchability.
In order to see progress women should be treated as the equal of men.
Difference in sex and physical form are denotes only differences in function and not difference in status.
Women should not be called as weaker sex.
If nonviolence is our law of being, the future is with women.
Social reform should go hand in hand with political and economic reforms.
Cows are endowed with a soul . it is the gift of Hinduism to the world.
Satyagraha means holding on to truth.
Satyagraha is his way of fighting tyranny and injustice.
He coined the word in South Africa. It is not passive resistance. It is active, but non-violent resistance.
It is vindication of Truth, not by infliction of suffering on the opponent, but on one’s own self.
The branches of Satyagraha are non-co-operation, civil disobedience etc.

ISKCON

ISKCON
Hare Krishna
A.C. Baktivedanta Swami Prabhupada
Prabhupada was the one introduced chanting of “Hare Krishna” as a way of salvation in the west.
He was born in Calcutta, in 1896, named  as Abhay Charan De.
He was a graduate of Calcutta University majoring English, Philosophy and economics.
He was active in independence movement.
In 1922, he first, met his guru Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati Maharaj.
In 1933 took initiation and was ordered to spread his teaching in the west.
But he worked until his retirement in 1954, as a manager of a chemical firm unit.
He did not renounce the world fully till 1959.
But from 1944 he began to express his religious idea sin English through a magazine called “Back to Godhead”.
Spreading the message in the west began in 1965, when he won a patron in Sumati Morarji, the owner of a India’s largest shipping firm.
She gave him a berth on one of her ships and some money to get him started on the mission.
He sat under a tree in Tomkinson Square, New York and began chanting his mantra “Hare Krishna…”
Few attracted  passers-by came for discourses . Some took initiation thus I ISKCON
 Was formed.
ISKCON claims that he is “the Acharya for this age.”
His succession goes back to Lord Chaitanya (born 1486) and to Krishna
Chaitanya came to set things right (BG). He started Hare Krishna and from him we (ISKCON) got the mantra.
History of the Hare Krishna Movement:
Chaitanya (1486- 1534) started ‘sankirtana’ movement or chanting Hare Krishna  in Bengal and Orissa.
His nagar sankirtana was very effective. But there was a break in between.
Now ISKCON founded by Prabhupada, has made Chaitanya’s message (or at least the mantra) popular in the west.
ISKCON was formed in 1966.
Their monthly magazine is called “back to Godhead”.
It has a factory for manufacturing incense in Los Angeles.
It was for financial stability and job to devotees.
ISKCON propagates the glory of Krishna in India with the help of foreign missionaries.
ISKCON considers all its members as equal.
ISKON was not first accepted in India. Of course now…
The appeal of the ISKCON in the West:
Appealed to young, who joined the early phase of “counter culture”.
Western – individualistic culture failed certain things that are promised in ISKCON i.e.
The desire for community, the desire for engagement (dealing directly with social problems) and the desire for dependence.
ISKCON met their obvious needs (warmth and friendliness).
It suited for hippies –
Surrendering to Krishna, serving him, and strict discipline.
For an average man he has to share 50% of his income with the community.
It was too difficult for average person
It did not appeal to Indians because of culture, faith, etc.
During the end of seventies ISKCON appealed to those successful in business,
From the previous dropouts of society. Thus it became strong in India.
Whether ISKCON is a genuine spread of religious culture in India or merely the economic success of a sect?
Now affluence. ISKCON slipped into materialism? Religion of the rich?
ISKCON’s membership fee was 4444- could stay in ISKCON guest house in the business cities of the world.
It was popular in India because it gave spiritual consolation to the affluent (guilt of economic offence).
It guaranteed a removal of moral guilt.
Now ISKCON has started service tot eh poor i.e. ISKCON rural development (IRD).
Whether ISKCON an provide a genuine philosophy for social action?
Teaching of ISKCON:
The favourite scriptures of ISKCON are Bhagavad Gita and Bhagavad Purana.
God is personal but the human soul is not God.
The material world is not illusion.
Idol worship is essential part of ISKCON devotional service.
The ultimate reality is personal God-Krishna.
The highest goal of Krishna consciousness is to realize ecstatic bliss f Krishna.
Krishna consciousness is the original pure state of the soul.
Chanting of the mantra brings the original Krishna consciousness.
Self realization is not merging into God, but realizing oneself as a part of God.
Not only man, animal and plants also have soul.
They migrate until reaching Krishna consciousness.
Guru plays important role in devotional service to Krishna. Without guru, cultivation of Krishna consciousness is impossible.
Therough chanting the mantra one can associate personally with Krishna.
Finally to Goloka Vrindavan- there Krishna lives eternally in the highest love relation with Radha.

Ayodhya

“Ayodhya ruling: SC relied on 1940 Privy Council Judgment
Dhananjay.Mahapatra
@timesgroup.com
New Delhi: In denying justice person status to Ram Janmasthan, the SC’s Ayodhya verdict relied on a 1940 Privy Council judgment which dealt with a Sikh Muslim ownership dispute leading to demolition of the Shahid Ganj mosque in Lahore.
The mosque, near Naulakha Bazar in Lahore , was dedicated in 1722 by Falak Beg Khan. It came to be occupied by Sikhs in 1762 during Ranjit Singh’s reign.
The land adjacent to the mosque became a site for Sikh martyrs and a gurdwara. A tomb of Sikh leader Bhai Taru Singh also came up.        When the British annexed Punjab, the mosque building and its property were in possession of the Sikhs.
            A suit filed by Nur Ahmed on behalf of Muslims seeking passion of the  mosque and surrounding land was first rejected in 1853. It attained finality in 1856. On the night of July 7, 1935, the mosque was demolished by or with connivance of its Sikh custodians under the influence of communal ill-feelings.
            Riots and disorder ensued and much resentment was felt and expressed by Muslims, the Privy Council judgment said while dealing with a petition filed on behalf of Masjid Shahid Ganj seeking a declaration that the mosque and its adjoining properties were a juristic person.
Babri Masjid too was attacked by a riotous mob in 1934 and its three domes were damaged.
Prior to this, in 1858, Nihang Singh Faqir Khalsa had intruded into the area under the mosque’s central dome and wrote ‘Ram” all over the place with charcoal.
In 1949, idols were placed under the central dome and in 1992, the mosque was demolished.
The Hindu parties had sought juristic personality for Ram Janmasthan.            A bench of then Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi and Justice S A Bobde (now CJI), D Y Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and S Abdul Nazeer relied on Justice George Rankin’s view in the Masjid Shahid Ganj case in denying the mosque and its properties juristic person status.”[1]


[1] Ayodhya ruling: SC relied on 1940 Privy Council Judgment,” The Times of India (Vijayawada) 22 November 2019, 5.

Ambedkar

Ambedkar
Ambedkar , when 38 years of age, in 1929 at Jalgon near Nagpur declared ‘Atisudras (Untouchables) would leave Hinduism and accept another religion in order to avoid social injustice done to them over a period of three millennia’.
The questions behind such declaration were:
Why barber refuses to cut hair?
Why he and other Mahar children were pushed out of wooden cart?
Why he had to sit outside the class? Etc.
Ambedkar finished his bachelor degree in arts in 1912.
The Maharaja of Baroda granted him a scholarship to study in Columbia University, USA. There, he completed masters and doctorate.
Then completed his Barrister at Law in London.
1924 he started ‘Bahishkrit Hitakarni Sabha’ to uplift the untouchables.
In 1942 started ‘Federation of All India Scheduled Castes”
He was minister of law in the first central cabinet of free India. Thus became chairman of the drafting committee of the Indian Constitution.
Ambedkar felt, for the upliftment, untouchables should leave Hinduism and accept a new religion.
For him the root of untouchability is caste.
Root of caste is religion i.e. Brahmanical religion.
Ambedkar was not against religion but against the cruel practices of religion.
In October 1935, at Yeola in Nasik, he encouraged the Mahars to choose any religion that gives them equal status and treatment.
On 12 th January 1936, at Poone conference it was decided to choose any religion even new.
The choice was left to Ambedkar.
He began to study different religions as he was receiving invitation from different religions
There were threatening letters as well.
Ambedkar believed ‘religion should be dynamic, not a static one’.
He tested religions on four criteria:
1 social life based on morality
2 morality that recognizes liberty, equality and fraternity.
3 Reconciliation between science and religion.
4 religion must not sanctify poverty.
For Ambedkar Hinduism is far away from these criteria.  He said ‘there cannot a thesis more false than the thesis that all religions are true’.
His view of Sikhism:
Positively it believes monotheism, powerful community behind it, love, value of human life, equal treatment to all adherents, solidarity for each other, disciplined, militant community (do things).
Negatively there is in Sikhism rigidity, inflexibility- ritual and practices.
He had to accept their scripture. It will  be ‘like shut in the structure again’.
His positive evaluation of Islam was that it is monotheistic, community (ummah) oriented, committed to improving human life.
The negative reasons are it is difficult with national and global community. It demands unquestionable surrender. It has destroyed many Hindu temples. There was also tension between Indian national congress and Muslim League.
The positive side of Christianity was that it accepted the outcastes. It is committed to humanization.
Negatively Christianity is proselytizing along the caste line (each group working with different caste)
Increase in number of Christianity will stiffen the British attitude in India.
Christianity is not expressed in Indian culture ( it is simply combination of Jewish Theology and Greek Philosophy). There are lots of denominational disputes. Christian dogmatism may lead to authoritarianism.
In 1950 Ambedkar decided to follow Buddhism for it attracted with three principles:
1 Prajna- understanding against superstition and supernaturalism.
2 teaching of Karuna i.e. love.
3 Samata- equality.
His conversion took place on 1956, October 13, at Nagpur (over 300 thousand).
Ambedkar died  in 1956 December, 6th.
By 1961 80% of Mahars converted to Buddhism.
The converts were called neobuddhists. It is called Navayana or Bhimayana. It rejected the Hinayana and Mahanayana Buddhism and followed a Buddhism explained by Ambedkar. It rejects practices and precepts such as renouncing monk and monasticism, karma, rebirth in afterlife, sansara, meditation, enlightenment and four noble truths. It radically reinterpreted what Buddhism is, revises the original Buddha teaching to be about class struggle and social equality. Ambedkar’s book Buddha and his Dhamma is the holy book of Navayana followers.
Neo Buddhists followed simple marriage practices, no superstition, many refused to do traditional occupation.
Some called Neo Buddhism as “The Ambedkar Cult”.
Reasons for revival of Buddhism:
European interest
Untouchable’s revolt against Hinduism
Periyar convened Buddhist conference in South India
In north there were Mahabhodi Society and Mahabhodi Journal
Before Ambedkar, in 1873 Mahatma Jotirao Phooley started ‘The Satya Shodhak Samaj (Truth seeking society).
After conversion disappointments. That is without economic development conversion alone does not help. There were evils in Buddhism as well.

Aligarh Movement- Sir Syed Ahmad Khan

Aligarh Movement- Sir Syed Ahmad Khan
Beginning of the 19th century witnessed the collapse of the Muhammadan empire in India.
This had direct effect on the Muslims as they had enjoyed economic power.
They developed bitter feeling against Europeans.
As a result Muslims failed to take advantage of the new education. Consequently the Muslims’   position in the North was more backward than the Hindus.
Syed Ahmad Khan (Delhi)
Born in 1817. From a noble family that had connections with the government.
He received Muhammadan education. He also found a position in British administration.
During Mutiny, he was instrumental in saving many Europeans.
He saw the dangerous condition of his community.
He grasped the real value of British rule in India..
He saw that Muslims in India should absorb the science and the education of the west.
Must introduce much social reforms within themselves.
Thus he spoke to friends and published pamphlets and books.
He also formed an association for the study of western science.
He started English schools, emphasized value of western education and culture.
He felt that westerners also should know Indian opinion including political.
Thus in 1866 started British Indian Association  to focus Indian opinion on politics.
In 1869 he went to England with his son to study English life and politics.
He paid more attention to education.
After returning to India, he published a monthly periodical  in Urdu “Tahzibul Akhlaq (reform of morals).
He combated prejudice against western science.
Advocated greater social freedom.
Encouraged Muslims for self confidence and vigorous effort.
Encouraged  friendship (relation) between Europeans and Muslims.
He lived in English style, received English guests and accepted their hospitality.
Consequently he was excommunicated, slandered and persecuted. He was called atheist, renegade and antichrist. But he held bravely on.
The climax of his educational effort was “Anglo Muhammadan College”  at Aligarh.
He wanted it to be like Oxford and Cambridge to the Muslims.
 He thought that good education (like western) and religious education (kuran) will produce people of good capacity.
The basic principle was that education must rest on religion.
Objectives of the college:
Muslims acquire English education without prejudice to their religion.
To organize boarding houses.
To give complete education.
Religious education was also given.
The college proved successful. Convinced the value of western education.
Khan started ‘Muhammadan Education Conference’. People from different places participated.
He also began permeation with modern ideas in religion.
            For him Muslim law has made human freedom impossible.  He was critical of Kuran, idea of God etc.
Against tradition he said, Bible and Kuran did not contradict one another.
He emphasized reason. For him reason alone is sufficient guide.
He was also in favor of Mutazilites school (liberal).
Political reforms:
When Muslims considered India as Dar-ut-harah (house of war0 he called it Dar-Ul- Islam (house of Islam). He published tract explaining ‘the cause of Indian Mutiny’.
To strengthen relationship he started British Indian Association.
Education Reform:
He emphasized on western education and social reform.
Started an ‘Association for the study of western science’.
He toured England. Lived in European style.
In 1875 started a school in Aligarh, later it became college in 1877.
He organized All India Mohammadan Education conference in 1886.
Religious Reforms:
Bible not corrupt. Hindus are not infidels.  Advocated Hindu Muslim unity. Reason alone is the sufficient guide.
 Social Reforms:
Khan disapproved Purdah.
He opposed polygamy.
The Aligarh Movement:
Syed was accepted by the government (for elite and peasants).
Government gave funds to college when in crisis.
In 1887 syed asked Muslims not to join congress 9 it is not anti-national).
Did not want Hindus to rule but the British to continue. Syed wanted a secular state (religion and politics should be separated).
In 1906 Muslim League was born (demand for Pakistan) in one of the Muhammadan educational conferences. This was after the death of Syed in 1898.
In 1920 the college was raised to the status of university. (AMU)
Later it became the intellectual centre for the demand for Pakistan(Syed was not responsible).

Aiyya Vazhi Cult

Aiyya Vazhi Cult 
1.Introduction
In India, the Brahmin myth called caste system determined the socio-religious, and economic rights of the people.  It was initiated to articulate the division of labour in the society.  In due course of time caste system became an oppressive force through the misinterpretation of it by the people of the high castes.  People in the lower strata of the society were torn, suppressed, subjugated, abused, tormented, and dehumanized by this unjust social, religious, and political structure.  Right to food, right to equality, and right to self-determination has been negated to a vast majority by the crude means of caste system.  The need for equality and social justice was realized a long time back in the history of humanity that produced new models for realizing it.  One of such model was the concept of Common Humanity.  In order to establish the concept of common humanity and its relevance we have chosen the Aiyya Vazhi cult as a model for our elaborate discussion.
1.1.        Common Humanity
Common Humanity[1]is a principle that stands for the total well being of the entire humanity.  It stands for the survival of all sections of the society irrespective of their social, religious, economic, gender, cultural, and caste differences.  Common Humanity envisions a world of Peacefulness, justice, and equality for the entire humanity.  For achieving common humanity, various attempts were taken from time immemorial, because, it encloses the whole humanity under one umbrella.  The importance of this concept is recognized when the place of peace, harmony and justice among human community is being robbed off by the vested interests of a particular religious or social or cultural or ideological group of people.  Thinkers and religious leaders envisioned restoration of the ideals of equality and establishment of an ideal living condition for humanity whenever necessity arose.  Therefore, the glimpses of this concept is scattered in all the religious traditions.  However, we will be using this term as an archetype of a socio-religious, political and economic order that negates discriminations based on caste, class and gender differences.  We have chosen the Aiyya Vazhi cult, as a model for its vision for establishing a just economic, social, political, cultural, and religious world for all.
1.2.        Evolution of the Concept of Common Humanity
The arrival of the English colonizers, the works of the Christian missionaries, the Oriental studies, and English education shook the foundations of Hinduism that was overpowered by the caste restrictions.  This awakening has led people to question the oppressive and inhuman forces in the form of protest and rejection.  In order to protect Hinduism from the colonizing forces and to reform and revive Hinduism from its caste restrictions, socio-religious reform movements like Brahmo Samaj, Arya Samaj, and Rama Krishna Mission emerged.  In Travancore, it was Vaikuntar of Aiyya Vazhi cult [1808-1851], and Sri Narayana Guru [worked among the Ezhavasof Travancore] endeavoured to liberate the people of the lower castes from the clutches of caste prejudices and accomplish the task of achieving equality for the downtrodden masses.  In the paper, therefore, we have made an attempt to identify the ideological basis of Aiyya Vazhi Cult with a special focus on its vision for common humanity and its significance in the socio-religious and political context of Kanyakumari district, today. 
2.    AiyyaVazhi Cult in Travancore
2.1 People of Travancore
Kanyakumari District was part of the small princely state named Travancore till 1956[2].  Travancore was inhabited with people of upper and the lower caste, namely, the Brahmins, Nambudiris, Nairs, Nadars, Ezhavas, Pulayas, Pariahs, and Kuravas.  Hinduism, Christianity, and Islam were the major religious traditions of the People of Travancore.  Discriminations on the basis of caste were exercised.  People of the lower castes were not even allowed to enter the Hindu temples.  Below the Sudras or Nairs there were Shanars called as Nadars in the South.  The Shanars cultivated and climbed the palmyra palm from which they drew the sweet juice that they turned into coarse country sugar to eke out a living.  The Nadars of Travancore claimed that they had been warriors and rulers, and had migrated into the state at the request of the kings of Travancore to be of service to them.  They are believed to have migrated from and through Tirunelveli from Jaffna.  Bishop Caldwell described them as belonging to the highest division of the lowest classes or the lowest of the middle classes.  They were considered as half-polluting caste and had to keep spatial distance from the high castes.  They were not allowed to carry umbrellas, to use footwear, or carry water-pots on their hips.  They could milk cows but could neither build houses above one storey nor tile them.  Kings ruled even at the arrival of the East India Company.  The Kings were forced to pay a large amount to the Britishers as tax, and in response they enforced heavy tax on the Nadars[3].  Religiously, Nadars were not allowed to enter into the temples.  Socially, the Nadars were considered as avarnas on the basis of the classical Hindu caste division.  They were considered as untouchables and as a result they were obliged to stay at least twelve feet away from the Brahmins.  Nadarmen and women were not allowed to wear jewels or upper clothes.  On the other hand, the Nambudiris[4] enjoyed high privileges in the socio-religious arena at the cost of the underprivileged people.  Thus, the community of the Nadars suffered under the prejudices of caste hierarchy.  Their basic human rights were negated.  They lost their right to equality, self-determination, and living was negated.
2.2 Birth of Lord Vaikuntar
Mudi Soodum Perumal’, who was later called as Lord Vaikuntar, was born in a poor Nadar family at Swamythoppu, a village five miles northwest of Kanyakumari, in South Travancore, on 2nd Marth 1808 CE[5].  Vaikuntar’s parents were Ponnumadan and Veiyilal.  They were ardent devotees of Lord Vishnu, and therefore Vaisnavites of Hinduism.  As they had no right for property, they had their hut in the palmyrah gardens and coconut grove of landlord Poovander[6].  According to R. Ponnu, Vaikuntar’s parents themselves were praying for egalitarian society beyond all caste distinctions and the dominance of one caste over the other.  He got the vision of Lord Vishnuand claimed himself as Vishnu’s incarnation.  He challenged caste Hinduism and built new temples, named as pati’s where every one is allowed to enter inside and worship God.  He proposed a new religion of common humanity in the then emerging context of struggle for social equality and liberation.  Religious education was imparted and was intended towards liberation from social evils and discriminations that led to a new identity, self-respect and freedom in all spheres of the subjugated people.[7]
2.3 Religious Thought of Aiyya Vaikuntar
The preaching of Aiyya Vaikuntar and the ritual practices enunciated by him had two basic aspects.  At one level, he tried to alter the folk Hinduism of the Nadars and make it cohere with that of the upper castes.  At another level, he challenged the caste based inequalities suffered, by the Nadars and promised to eliminate the present Kaliyuga [age of despair] and usher in a golden age of Dharma [age of justice and peace].[8]  The cult’s propagation of several practices such as giving up ‘devil’ worship and animal sacrifices and adopting cleanliness and vegetarian food were all part of the upper caste Hinduism in Travancore.  This was an effort to bridge the gap between the folk Hinduism of the Nadars and the elite Hinduism of the upper castes.   The only exception to this was Vaikuntar’s opposition to idol worship that was his effort to wean away his followers from the numerous folk deities who were worshipped in idol form.[9]
            Vaikuntar taught that his mission was to save the souls from Kali.  He wanted to make a beginning for the slow demise of the unseen enemy Kali.  He strongly believed that in the previous yugas the enemies existed there in the name of Soora, Hiranya, Ravana, and Thuryothana.  Then, god came as Subramanya, Naraimha, Rama, and Krishna and killed them.  But in Kali yugam, the enemy is the unseen kali.  It has no structure: but is present everywhere.  It is within every human soul.  To destroy it, god wanted the entire power of the good, and therefore Shiva, Brahma, and Vishnu incarnated as a single god in Aiyya Vaikuntar.[10]  Therefore, Vaikuntar himself laid the cornerstone for the liberation of the subjugated people and the establishment of an era of common Humanity.
2.3.1 Temple Worship
The temple of Aiyya Vazhi Cult is unique.  Unlike other temples in India, there is no idol, deepa arathi, priest to perform pujas and above all no hundi in the temple.  The presiding deity of the temple is Aiyya Narayanar.  The trinity, Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva united in one being is believed to have come to earth to save humankind at the end of kaliyugam.  Though there ar no priests in the temple in the traditional sense, there is one guru in this temple.  The devotees in chorus repeat the hymns sung by the guru.[11]  The presiding deity is a spear, holding a cloth folded in the shape of namam and with a large mirror behind it in the sanctum sanctorum.  The mirror is supposed to tell the devotee ‘first see yourself and you can visualize God within you’.  In the morning the worship starts with the chanting of a newly coined mantra ‘Aiyya siva siva arakara arakara’ and the main worship is done five times a day.[12]
            One who comes to worship the deity should make five pradakshanams and prostrate before the deity.  The idea behind it is that one has to control all the five senses before surrendering to the almighty.  The traditional Hindu practice of lighting the camphor and incense is prohibited in this temple.  Betel leaves, betel nuts, lemon, flowers and coconut are given as offerings.  After the worship is over the guru applies the sacred mud [Thiruman] on the devotees’ forehead in the form of namam.  A specially made gruel is given as prasadamto the devotees.[13]  The offering made to the deity is distributed to the devotees present in the temple.  The devotees offer prayer to the deity with their towels tied around their head, unlike the traditional Hindu practice of tying the towel around the waist.[14]
2.3.2. Simplification of Religion
Vaikuntar wanted to simplify the religion so that is could reach the common people.  In Hinduism, people worshipped several deities and each and every deity should be worshipped in a particular way.  The norms and customs were very difficult for the common people to practice.  The way of worship was also much complicated.  It was even believed that the different kinds of oil used for lighting the lamp yielded different favours.[15]   But Vaikuntar’s simplification started with the structure of the temple itself.  The nizhal thangals were very simple buildings and the worship at these places was also very clean not only mentally but also physically.  One can worship Aiyya according to his / her own will and pleasure.   No poojas; no poojaries; no karpooram; no agarbathi; no hundies.[16]  Equality is also strictly maintained here.  There is no difference between the rich and the poor.  When a devotee enters the temple with a turban on the head, and a full length dhoti around the waist and without any dress on the upper part of his body [for men only], he/she can see all other devotees dressed in the same way.[17]
2.3.3. Ahilahirattu Ammanai
Ahilathirattu Ammanai, is a historical ballad and the scripture of the Aiyya Vazhi cult is written by Hari Gopalan, one of the five prime disciples of Sri Vaikunda Swamigal vividly discusses the life and work of Swamigal along with a number of puranic and mythological accounts.  Along with the life of Sri Vaikunda Swamigal the incarnations of Lord Narayana have also been narrated.  The ballad clearly reveals its central theme as the story of the emergence of sri Vaikunda Swamigal to establish dharma Yuga.  Hid preachings and foretelling have been discussed spontaneously.[18]  The Ammanai sheds tears on the social and economic oppression and disabilities of the lower caste people.  A detailed list of taxes, imposed on the lower castes is also discussed in the ballad.  It is the sacred book of the Vaikunda Swamigal sect.  In the month of Karthigai eduvasitthal, the reading and the explanation of the ballad is very common in the pathis and Nizhalthankals.  Arulnul, a supplementary work to the ballad also gives various information on Sri Vaikunda Swamigal.  It also contains many prayer songs, which are recited by the people of the sect on various occasions in these days.[19]  Since the Ammanaicriticized and condemned the then ruling king and the higher caste people, the printing of the ballad was delayed for some time and remained only in the form of palm leaves.  Fearing the opposition of the caste Hindus, the balled was not at all opened for systematic study.  It was only in 1939, the ballad took its printed form and circulated among the people.[20]
2.3.4. The Religious Language
The Vedas and Upanishads were the religious books of classical Hinduism.  These were in Sanskrit and hence, could not be learned by the common people.  Therefore Vaikuntar instituted that the language used in the temple and the nizhal thangals must be strictly in Tamil.  Aiyya Vaikntar used Tamil in temple worship so that even common people could understand the meaning of what they hear.  It is also very easy for the non-privileged communities to practice.  The marriage mantras are also in Tamil only.[21]
2.3.5. Protest Against Animal Sacrifice
Vaikuntar was a severe critic of animal sacrifice.  It was a period of superstitious beliefs that the lower caste people never prayed properly to their gods for blessings and gifts and attributed to their gods’ feelings, gentleness and compassion.  In order to prevent the evil influence of devil deities, the people tried to appease them to secure their fovour.  They sacrificed goats, cocks and hens.  The reigning sentiment was one of fear rather than of piety towards God.[22]  In ancient days, animal sacrifice was conducted even in very big temples by high caste Hindus.  The palipeedamas seen in almost all the temples bear testimony to this fact.  Swamigal condemned such religious customs and fought against animal sacrifice and libation of blood.  He never permitted His devotees even to break coconuts in temples.  We can see this being strictly followed by Aiyya vazhidevotees in the nizhal thangals.[23]  He said those who practiced sacrifice were not His people.  His followers took his words in the right sense and, there is no room for this evil practice in Aiyyavazhi.  His followers say that God who created all the living beings will not be happy if we snuff life out of his creatures.[24]
2.3.6. Abolition of Devil Worship
Contrary to the pre-existing religious practices of the Nadars, Aiyya Vaikuntar instructed his followers to give up ‘devil’ worship and idol worship. During this period devil-worship was firmly established and most commonly practiced among the lower caste people.  The belief in the power for mischief possessed by the devils…………………that even the Brahmins were not free from it.  The avarnas believed that the sorrow and trouble that befall them are all the work of invisible and malicious spirits.  And they believed in numerous inferior spirits, most of which were evil and destructive.  They used to offer prayers and sacrifices by way of propitiation.  Large numbers of pey-koils or devil-temples were found in the villages of lower castes.[25]  Their staunch belief in the evil forces made their life very miserable.  They thought that the primary cause of all natural disturbances and troubles were because of the evil spirits.  They considered the occurrence of disease as the result of demon possession.  They feared the devil-gods and made numerous offerings for pleasing them.[26]  Vaikuntar attempted to liberate the people from the influence of the evil spirits.  He openly declared that he had burnt all the devils [Ahilam:247]
2.3.7. Denunciation of Idolatry
Vaikuntar’s preaching about the temple worship was of great significance.  He discouraged idol worship.  He discouraged keeping Hundis [offertory box] in temples and also giving Kanikkai[offerings].[27]  Vaikundar asked the people not to offer sacrifices of goats, roosters and pigs to the deities.  Not merely animal sacrifices, he preached, but no other offerings such as eggs, fried meat and local edibles like ponkal, murukku, paniyarram, avalurundai and kadaiapal were asked for by the gods.[28]  Rather, leading to all sorts of meaningless ritualistic practices and giving birth to superstitions, the idol worship led the priests to exploit the illiteracy and ignorance of the common people.  Hence, he denounced idol worship and compelled his followers to detest and resist the same.  During the period of Vaikuntar, the lower caste people worshipped their gods in the form of images or idols.  Although they had no temples for their gods, they erected small pyramids of mud or bricks in their honour, plastered and white washed.  A large number of such pyramids existed all over rural areas.  He considered this kind of worship as an uncivilized custom.  He protested against worshipping images by his followers. He also disapproved animal worship.[29] 
2.3.8. Nizhal Thangal
Vaikuntar established simple hut like structure in seven places, namely Chettykudiyiruppu, Agastiswaram, Palur, Sundavillai, Vadalivillai [all in Kanyakumari District], Kadampankulam, and Pampankulam [in Tirunelveli District], where all the preaching were practiced.  These structures were locally known as Nizhal Thangals or Inanthangals.[30]  In appearance, the Nizhal Thangals werenothing but small huts that give Nizhal [shadow] to the people.  The people considered these Nizhal Thangals as the abode of dharma.  Vaikuntar used these Nizhal Thangals as an instrument to unite all the people, to feed the poor, to propagate his ideas, and to preach and practice equality among the people of various castes.[31]
            The common people call these Nizhal Thangals as Narayanaswamikoil or Narayanaswami pathi.  People of various castes come to worship in such Nizhal Thangals.  Festivals namely Palvaippuvizha are conducted generally twice or thrice in a year during which people offer dharma [offerings]to the poor.  Thus, it is obvious that these Nizhal Thangals served as the centers of Dharma Paripalana.[32]  Apart from feeding the poor, these places of worship, where caste based restriction on entry was not ……………………………………..Thangals, but only mass prayers, affirming the communitarian orientation of the cult.  Over the years, such Nizhal Thangals had proliferated in number and some of them doubled as village schools.[33]  Thus Nizhal Thangals are the places where religious rituals, idol worship and offerings were prohibited.  Worship for them is nothing but offering dharma in the name of Aiyya.  Thus, it served us an important institution in the socio-religious realm of the Aiyya Vazhi cult, because it revolutionized the mode and formalities of worship in temples
2.3.9. Thuvayal Panthy
Thuvayal Panthy was a set of practices[34]that was essentially meant to establish the importance of cleanliness and simple food [vegetarian], and it was first introduced at Vagaipathi near Kanyakumari.  The devotees who participate in Thuvayal Panthy had to take bath thrice a day and wash their clothes before attending Vaikuntar’s discourses on utchipadippu, ugapadippu, pathiram, sivakanda adikarapathiram, and other social aspects.  They had to give up their usual fare of fish, which the Shanars and other lower castes were obsessively fond of, and drink gruel made of rice and green gram cooked in seawater, that too only during noon they were allowed to have food.  A number of families participated in Thuvayal Panthy, and it was claimed that, at one point, seven hundred families participated in it.  The principle of cleanliness propagated through Thuvayal Panthy seemed to have become a general norm to the members of the cult.[35]  And the people those who participated in the Thuvayal Panthy were called as the Thuvayalkaras.  Vaikuntar asked them to go throughout the country and preach the Practice of Thuvayal Panthy.[36]
            Thuvayalkaras took only vegetables and boiled rice and used fresh water for cooking and bathing.  Thuvayal Panthy was also practiced while they were in family life.[37]  Through this organization Vaikuntar trained his followers to inculcate the idea of purity of thought and action and initiated the process of a sort of sanskritisation.  However, the Thuvayal Panthy established by Aiyya Vaikuntar was also an important factor that led to the abolition of the caste inequalities.  In practice, it was a movement aimed at achieving equal status for the downtrodden people.  The people of lower caste were less accustomed to cleanliness and proper sanitation due to their incessant work.  They were in a poor hygiene condition.  It was one of the reasons claimed by the high castes why the people of lower caste were considered untouchables.  Vaikuntar took notice of this situation and tried to mend the poor sanitary condition of the Lower castes.  Therefore, the Thuvayal Panthy initiated by Vaikuntar could be considered as one of the major movement to lift the status of the downtrodden people.
2.3.10. Dharma and Dhama Yuga
What is Dharma? Dharma is righteousness that underlies the law.  When this righteousnessis thought of as God, temple and religion, there will not be any interreligious rivalry, religious unrest ad conversions, Vaikuntar said that dharma yuga will dawn in the world gradually, not all of a sudden.  He says that dharma is the only way to reach God.  He preached that annadharmamis the most important of all the dharmasand whenever people reach a place of worship, they should worship God and go back with their stomach full.  Only then, people will have time to think of God and righteousness.[38]  Moreover in dharma yuga, there will be no caste but a single creed and religion.  There will be only one government.  There won’t be any difference between the ruler and the ruled.  There will be neither poverty nor disease. Dharma will be the God.  There won’t be any temple, police station or court because there won’t be any crime.  Dharma yuga will be a world of wholesomeness.[39]  His idea of the reign of dharma yuga made him a great humanist and an advocate of universalism.  His proceedings had an undercurrent of philanthropic approach.
2.3.11. Aiyya Vazhi Cult as a New Religious Sect
Vaikuntar’s religious reform was closely associated with the social reform, for they were complementary to each other.  The reason is that in the early nineteenth century religion had to be the principal and leading force in implementing all social changes in India.  Moreover, in a state like Travancore where religion was used as the pivotal force for conducting the day-to-day administrative affairs and where even kings themselves were enslaved to the Brahmin priests, Swamigal thought social reform would be possible only with religious reform.  He never established any religious system like Buddhism or Jainism.  However, with the emergence of his reform movement, a new sect of Hinduism appeared as a curious phenomenon in the religious history of Travancore.[40]  The followers of Aiyya are called as Aiyya Vazhi makkal [people who follow the path of Aiyya]
            The religions reform of Vaikuntar therefore left an everlasting influence on South Travancore society.  Though his religions reform challenged the Hindu orthodoxy, it neither encouraged the people to worship any particular God, nor to construct any temple or to conduct any ceremony.  He laid emphasis only on dharma or charity to attain salvation.  His principle, in its essence, is to see God in the smiles of the poor.[41]
He Said:
            Those who help the poor are my people.
            And they will attain the lotus feet of God [Ahilam: 170-171].
According to the religious doctrine of Aiyya Vazhi cult, one can see the invisible hands of God in the poor because God is with none but the poor.  Universal brotherhood and prosperity to one and all is the motto of this cult.  This ideology cuts across the narrow limits of caste, creed and religion, and his universal religion is applicable to all.[42]
2.3.11.1. Reverence as Aiyya
Vaikunda Swamigal assumed the status of Aiyya [father] to all his followers, who are generally called Aiyya vazhi [people who follow the path of Swamigal] or anbukkodi makkal [people who adopt the love-flag].  The followers of Swamigal affirmed that the worship of their Aiyya was really a worship of the Supreme Being.  His devotees became a separate sect of Vaishnavism in Hindu religious, for he had been worshipped as a manifestation of Lord Vishnu.  Though the followers were within the fold of Hindu religion, they apprehended the Brahmin priests and never entertained worship in Brahminical temples.[43]
2.3.11.2. Wearing of Namam
In Travancore, disparity was seen among the people in getting the holy ash from the Temple priests.  In the case of Sucindram temple, till 1928 A.D. the prasadam or holy ash was given in the hands of Brahmins by the Vattappalli or his assistant.  While it was thrown on a raised platform of stone near the rsabha mandapa to be picked up by the non-Brahmin worshippers.[44]  Therefore Vaikuntar  instituted the practice of wearing namam.  As a result the followers of Vaikuntar smeared tiruman [sacred soil] on their forehead and at times on the parts of their body as well.  It is a customary practice in pathis and Nizhalthankals to put the mark on the forehead to each and every worshipper in person and give tirumanto each individual in his / her hands.[45] 
            The emergence of the Aiyya Vazhi cult, thus, is basically bound to the socio-religious and political context of the 18-19th century Travancore.  Travancore was inhabited with people of upper and the lower castes.  Discriminations on the basis of caste were exercised.  People of the lower castes were not even allowed to enter the Hindu temples.  Economically, people of the lower castes were further subjugated through the imposition of various taxes.[46]  Thejenmam and jenmies system and the ritual status added to the land denied the right of owning land for the lower caste people.  Politically the people of the lower castes were voiceless.  Dehumanization prevailed on the upper castes.  Punishments were severe for even minor mistakes.  People of the lower castes were forced to do menial jobs, which negated their identity.  Altogether the socio-political, economical, and religious context of Travancore was hostile towards the lower caste people, and therefore the groaning for freedom from the shackles of bondage was felt all over Travancore.
            The arrival of the English colonizers and the works of the Christian missionaries, on the other hand, shook the foundations of the Hinduism that was overpowered by the caste restrictions.  Therefore, the socio-religious and political situation of the 18-19th century Travancore paved the way for the emergence of aspiration for liberation in the form of Aiyya Vazhi Cult.[47]  The birth of Vaikuntar was a long a awaited one among the people of the lower castes of Tavancore, who were struggling under the caste restrictions.  When the English missionaries worked for the betterment of the Christian concerts from the lower castes, the condition of the Hindu lower castes was disheartening.  This could be the other reason for the emergence of this cult.  Therefore, it is the milieu in which people were groaning under the unjust social, political, religious, and economical conditions based on caste hierarchy, and the threat of colonization instigated Vaikuntar to oppose such unjust and mean treatment of the people of the lower castes.
2.3.12 Present Status of Aiyya Vazhi Cult
The Temples of this cult are known as pathis.  There are five important pathis viz., Thamaraikulam pathi, Samithoppu pathi, Muttapathi, Pallattu pathi and Duvaraga pathi [all in Kanniyakumari District].  Besides these, there are innumerable small pathis which are known as Nizhalthankals or Inanthankals.  At present, thousands of pathis are seen throughout the various parts of South India.  People of various castes like Nadars, Vellalas, Tevars, Nambiars, Yadavas, Pariahs, Barbars, Vannars, Nairs and Panikkars conduct these Pathis.  However, majority of the followers of this sect are Nadars.[48]
            The followers of this cult hold three festivals in Swamithoppu pathi in the Tamil months of Avani [August-September], Thai, [January-February] and Vaikasi [May-June].  Each festival is conducted for eleven days beginning with a flag-hoisting ceremony and ending with a car festival Interdining is an ordinary occurrence in the pathi.  Where the devotees bring rice and vegetable for the purpose of preparation of the sacred meal, called unban.  On the eighth day of the 11day festival, people of various castes, come from far and near, take their meals jointly with great enthusiasm.  An important feature in the major pathis is the presence of pandarams,[49]a group of mendicants who depended solely on the dharma, given by devotees.  They are ascetics who cast off their secular attachments and abandon all means of kinship.  In general, these pandarams are staunch devotees of Vaikunda Swamigal who always praised their Aiyya.[50]
2.4. Social Thought of Aiyya Vaikuntar
2.4.1. Radical Approach to Caste System
Aiyya Vaikuntar opposed caste-based inequalities.  In his preaching he condemned the excessive taxes and the uliyum services imposed on the Shanars by the Travancore king.  He told his followers that one of the crimes of Ravana, the mythological opponent of mythological Rama, was excessive taxation, and a just king, like the ancient Chola rulers, would not demand more than a sixth of the total produce a tax, and such a king would not even insist upon that.  Vaikuntar characterized the Travancore as Neesan [oppressor] and emboldened his followers that if a Shanar woman cursed the king everyday, the king would die.  He claimed, unless the king announced through drum beating that the Shanars were relieved of uliyum services, he would lose his right to rule.[51]
2.4.2. Head Turban
Vaikuntar made an appeal to the lower caste people to lead an independent life without any fear of the dominant castes.  He vowed to remove the humility which was imposed on the Nadars by the government and by the upper caste people.  During the time of Vaikuntar, the lower caste people were prohibited to wear cloth below the knee and above the waist.  They were even prohibited from using turban to carry any luggage on their head.[52]  They were permitted to use only a bunch of dry hay and palm leaves, locally known as summadu, on their heads.  He asked his followers to wear a turban while entering his place of worship.[53]  To use head turban was no less than a social revolution, for it had negated the caste supremacy and openly violated the prevailing custom.  It was a means of providing a sense of freedom to the oppressed people.  Through this practice Vaikuntar installed confidence and self-respect in the minds of his followers.  It led them to the shedding off their fear and all shades of subservience.  The practice of wearing a turban while entering the temple still continues among his followers during the time of worship at Swamithoppu.
2.4.3 Muthiri Kinaru
To Practice equality, Vaikuntar dug a community well at Swamithoppu.  This well was known as Muthiri Kinaru.  This was the first well of the region where all the caste, were permitted to scoop out water.[54]  While in Travancore society access to well was discriminated on the basis of castes [people of lower castes were prohibited from using the public wells in the village], Muthiri kinaru offered its water, which was believed to have curative power, to all castes-mostly of those castes that were below the Shanars in the caste hierarchy.[55]  The holy water was called as Muthiripatham.[56]
2.4.4. Table Fellowship
Vaikuntar regularly organized inter-dining or table fellowship among different castes around the Muthiri kinaru in order to abolish the feeling of untouchability.  People belonging to different castes brought uncooked food, cooked it with the water of Muthiri kinaru and ate it in a community feast along with Vaikuntar.[57]  Vaikuntar enacted this practice when people of the lower castes were forced to live in seclusion outside the village.  Also individuals of different castes were prohibited from seating in a single row or eating together during those days.  Therefore, it was an attach on caste Hinduism that avoided such fellowship on the basis of purity pollution and caste hierarchy.  Thus, Vaikuntar has successfully initiated the movement towards the achievement of equality.
2.4.5. Samathuva Samajam
Vaikuntar was very much longing for the establishment of equality among people of various caste groups.  His teachings were mainly centered on the protection of the rights of the underprivileged and guarantees equal rights for all.  R. Ponnu claims that Vaikuntar founded a society based on his ideals for the propagation of samattuvam [equality] known as Samattuva Samajam or Samattuva Sangam.[58]  But the present guru Bala Prajapati denied the claim of Vaikuntar forming an independent society as Samattuva Samajam.  Rather, he admits that all the teachings of Vaikuntar were centered on the central doctrine called equality.[59]  N. Elango has opined that the Thuvayal Karas [those who attended the Thuvayal Panthy] went to different villages and spread the doctrines of Samattuvam [equality] among various castes, and thereby gradually the society for equality gained momentum in the name of Samattuva Samajam.[60] 
2.4.6. Anbu Kodi
Vaikunda Swamigal gave much importance to love and charity in social life.  He considered these qualities as the bedrock of his movement.  In keeping with the cult’s spirit of undiscriminating love, Vaikuntar adopted a saffron flag with a white patch in the middle, known as anbu kodi [flag of love].[61]  He called his followers anbukodimakkal [people of love-flag].  The flag is red ochre in colour that is the symbol cf sacrifice and strong mind, with a white tridental mark that stands for purity, peace and love.  The mark is also in the shape of a lamp that expresses the idea of wisdom and justice.  In the pathisand Nazhal Thangals, the followers of Swamkgal even now hoist this love-flag.  The direction of the flag hoisted at Swamithoppu forecasts good and evil things.  If it flies towards the south, rain will be scarce, but if it flies towards the north, it will mean assured rains.  The devotees of Swamigal carry this flag in their procession on the incarnation day [Masi 20] of every year.[62]  Thus, the reign Vaikuntar envisioned was not on the basis of power, violence, or force, rather it was based on love, justice, and truth.  It was an endeavour of reclaiming the rights of the people, who were subjugated, ill-treated as non-humans, tortured, brutally assaulted, and massacred. 
2.4.7. Equal Status to Women
The socio-political, religious, and economic condition of 18th century Indian women in general was miserable.  They were uneducated, and were considered as mere animals kept for burden or for slaughter.  Traditions and customs were heavily loaded upon them.  In Travancore the social circumstances and daily life of the poor, low caste or slave women who are obliged to labour for their daily support, and sometimes have nothing to eat on any day on which they remain idle, present a direct contrast to the comfort of higher section as might be expected from the condition of extreme and enforced degradation in which they have been so long kept, and the contempt and abhorrence with which they are universally regarded, yet they are human as well as their superiors.  They work hard, suffer much from sickness and often regarded, appears in the laws by which a man’s partner in life may be sent off at a moment’s notice.[63]  Caste regulations required low-caste female to carry the water pot only on the head, not on the hip or side.  Even in the early part of the 19thcentury, Vaikunda Swamigal urged for their liberation from the oppression of caste-ridden society.  He exhorted women to fight against every form of oppression.  He stressed the chastity of womenfolk.  He appealed to the people to protect women and to discourage their vice.
2.4.8. Upper Cloth Revolt
The Brahmanical tradition says that Parasurama prohibited the lower caste women from adorning themselves with jewels and from covering their bosoms.  The Brahmin women alone could enjoy the right to wear jewels and breast clothes.  Of course, they also moved about in their houses exposing the upper part of their body.  The Nair women were not accustomed to cover their body while in the house but, when they went out, they covered the bosoms with a piece of light white cloth.  The Nair women were required to appear with bare breast before the Nambudiris.  They would cover their middle with a long piece of cloth hanging down but seldom going below the knees.  They felt no shame to expose their charms by leaving the upper portion of their body above their waist uncovered.[64]  The Nadarslike the other lower castes were prohibited to cover their bosoms.  The manner of dress prescribed for the Nadars consisted of a single cloth of coarse texture, to be worn by males and females alike not lower than the knee or higher than the waist.[65] 
            Vaikuntar opposed the denial of right to Nadarswomen to wear shoulder cloth.  In order to put the deprived classes on equality with the upper caste people, he encouraged his people to wear shoulder cloth and to carry pot on their hip.  There were strong reactions among the upper caste people to this.  It was an affront, and the defiant attitude enraged the government and the upper caste people.  The result was that retaliation in a murderous manner with impunity followed.  Orgy was let loose.  The upper caste people beat the lower caste, females, stripped their cloth, prevented them from carrying the pot on the hip and forced them to follow the past customs.[66]  However, the Nadars continued to strengthen their right to wear upper cloth and finally succeeded. 
3.   Evaluation of Aiyya Vazhi Cult’s Attempts for Common Humanity
The Socio-religious reform movement organized by vaikuntar produced far-reaching changes among the downtrodden people.  Hailing from a depressed community, he vehemently criticized the upper strata of society and their governmental machinery.  His revolutionary teachings gave a rude shock to the feudal social set up of South India and Travancore, in particular.  This was the first open mass agitation against the fossilized customs of society.  Through his reform activities, he became the pioneer of the social reformers of modern South India.  However, the common assumption is that the Aiyya vazhi cult is exclusively related with the empowerment of the Nadarcaste, aline.  And the questions put forward by critics are: what is the role of Aiyya vazhi cult in the achievement of common humanity in general?  What are the attempts of Aiyya vazhi cult in attaining equality for the people of the lower castes other than the Nadarcommunity?
            In answering to these questions it is interesting to note that initially the adherents of this cult were from the Nadar community alone.  One of the reasons could be that Vaikuntar himself belong to the Nadar caste.  On the other hand, it is equally important for us to notify the development it underwent in the past two centuries.  Also, the intention of Vaikuntar was not to establish an exclusive cultic worshiping community for a particular caste, rather his vision was inclusive in its content.  It is evident from the teachings of Vaikuntar himself that the avatarof Vaikuntar is for the restoration of equality and dignity for eighteen castes [which includes Nadar caste also].[67]  And through the field research the researcher has identified the devotees of this cult is not only limited to the Nadar caste of Kanyakumari alone, but people of different lower castes of Kanyakumari as well as neighbouring districts of  Tamil Nadu are given equal importance in conducting worship and ownership of the Nizhal Thangals [worship places].  An ideal society is the one that provides individuals the right to freedom and protection, the right of equality through the cessation of all discriminations, and the right to participate in governance of the society and its decisions.  This is actualized through this cult.
            The divine intervention in the restoration of peace, justice, harmony, and total well being of the humanity finds another evidence through this cultic formation.  Vaikuntar himself had to undergo the atrocities on the basis of caste system through which he became aware of the cruelty of caste system.  This could have motivated him to instigate a movement against the caste system.  On the other hand, western colonizers in regard to the social religious and economic arenas propagated a wave of new ethos of freedom.  This also influenced the people of Travancore to aspire for restoration of human dignity and respect in the form of cultic formation.
            The consolidation of Aiyya Vazhi cult through the years was fruitful in such a way that much of its efforts were highly appreciated even by the new generation.  The shift in its function from a mere movement of protest against caste inequality to the emergence of a well furnished religious cult beyond caste, religious tradition that stands for equality and human dignity that we name as common humanity.   Here we have one humanity; one religion; and one caste.  And the whole humanity is the descendents of God; no one is superior or inferior, rather everyone is equal.  Ideologically it is sound, but its effects are little short when we consider the present situation of Kanyakumari district.  The existence of caste differences can still be traced in Kanyakumari.  Therefore, new modes of praxis-oriented religious doctrines based in the realization of the vision of Vaikuntar needs to be evolved. 
Conclusion
The emergence of the cult of Aiyya Vazhi was for a wholistic development of the humanity.  The attempts of Vaikuntar were centered on reclaiming dignity and well being to the followers.  The self-respect achieved through this cult is remarkable.  It is people’s movement for the attainment of equality, human rights, and self-respect.  Society is envisioned not as the force of enslavement rather the place where love peace, justice and harmony is assured.  A shift in the understanding of religion is achieved through breaking the backbone of the religious setup, where the religious Hinduism was used to subjugate and manipulate the people of the lower castes.  The practices of Thuvayal Panthy, Samathuva Samajam, and Nizhal Thangals are revolutionary as well as self-redemptive in its content and essence.  The concept of common Humanity finds its maximum fulfillment through the model of Aiyya Vazhi Cult.


[1] Common Humanity’ is a term use by S. Wesley Ariarajah to prove the universal relationship of God. For him, there is only one God who is the creator of everything and everybody.  Bible speaks about the whole human family in which Adam and eve are the prototypes of the common humanity of all people, S. Wesley Ariarajah, The Bible and people of Other Faiths [Geneva: W.C.C., 1985], 1-3.
[2] Joy Gnanadason, Forgotten History: The Story of the Missionary Movement [Madras: G.L.T.C.R.I. 1994], 24.
[3] Ibid., Joy Gnanadason. Op.cit., 24-25. Cf. also Bishop R. Caldwell.  A History of  Tinnevelly, [New Delhi: Asian Educational Services, 982], 4.
[4]The Nambudiris are an exclusive group of Brahmins peculiar to Malabar.  They were at the apex of the social structure and who functioned as the trustees of temples and misappropriated for themselves vast temple properties and endowments.  They extended their power and domination in the socio-economic, religious and political arena whereby exploited the Nadars of Kanyakumari Cf. Joy Gnanadason, op.cit., 20-21. Cf.also. L.A. Krishna lyer. Social History of Kerala:vol:II-Dravidians [Madras: Book Centre Publications, 1970], 46-47.
[5] R. Ponnu, op.cit., 40. Scholars like N. Elango, and Vijaya Shanthi Elango suggest that the year of Vaikuntar’s birth could be 1809 C.E. Cf, N. Elango & Vijaya Shanthi Elango, op.cit., 5. Cf., N. Vivekanandan, Ahilathirattu Ammanai: Moolamum Uraium Part-I [Nagercoil: Vivekananda Publishers, 2003], xiv.
[6] N. Elango & Vijaya Shanthi Elango, op.cit., 5.
[7] R. Ponnu, op.cit., 40.
[8] M.S.S. Pandian, “Meanings of ‘Colonialism’ and ‘Nationalism’: An Essay on Vaikunda Swamy Cult,” Studies in History 8/2 [July-December, 1992], 179.
[9] M.S.S. Pandian, “Meanings of ‘Colonialism’ and ‘Nationalism’: An Essay on Vaikunda Swamy Cult,” Studies in History 8/2 [July-December, 1992], 180.
[10] N. Elango & Vijaya Shanthi Elango, Ayya Vaikuntar: The Light of the World [Theru: Jeya Press, 1997], 14.
[11] N. Elango & Vijaya Shanthi Elango, Ayya Vaikuntar: The Light of the World [Theru: Jeya Press, 1997, 17.
[12] N. Elango & Vijaya Shanthi Elango, Ayya Vaikuntar: The Light of the World [Theru: Jeya Press, 1997], 17.
[13] N. Elango & Vijaya Shanthi Elango, Ayya Vaikuntar: The Light of the World [Theru: Jeya Press, 1997], 18.
[14]N. Elango & Vijaya Shanthi Elango, Ayya Vaikuntar: The Light of the World [Theru: Jeya Press, 1997], 17.
[15] N. Elango & Vijaya Shanthi Elango, Ayya Vaikuntar: The Light of the World [Theru: Jeya Press, 1997], 36.
[16] N. Elango & Vijaya Shanthi Elango, Ayya Vaikuntar: The Light of the World [Theru: Jeya Press, 1997], 36.
[17] N. Elango & Vijaya Shanthi Elango, Ayya Vaikuntar: The Light of the World [Theru: Jeya Press, 1997], 36.
[18]R. Ponnu, Sri Vaikunda Swamigal and the Struggle for Social Equality in South India, [Madurai: Ram Publishers, 2000], 90.
[19]R. Ponnu, Sri Vaikunda Swamigal and the Struggle for Social Equality in South India, [Madurai: Ram Publishers, 2000], 91.
[20] R. Ponnu, Sri Vaikunda Swamigal and the Struggle for Social Equality in South India, [Madurai: Ram Publishers, 2000], 90.
[21] N. Elango & Vijaya Shanthi Elango, Ayya Vaikuntar: The Light of the World [Theru: Jeya Press, 1997], 36.
[22] N. Elango & Vijaya Shanthi Elango, Ayya Vaikuntar: The Light of the World [Theru: Jeya Press, 1997], 37.
[23] N. Elango & Vijaya Shanthi Elango, Ayya Vaikuntar: The Light of the World [Theru: Jeya Press, 1997], 37.
[24] N. Elango & Vijaya Shanthi Elango, Ayya Vaikuntar: The Light of the World [Theru: Jeya Press, 1997], 38.
[25] R. Ponnu, Sri Vaikunda Swamigal and the Struggle for Social Equality in South India, [Madurai: Ram Publishers, 2000], 67-68.
[26] Samuel Mateer, Land of Charity [London:n.p., 1871], 213-214.
[27] N. Elango & Vijaya Shanthi Elango, Ayya Vaikuntar: The Light of the World [Theru: Jeya Press, 1997], 15.
[28] M.S.S. Pandian, “Meanings of ‘Colonialism’ and ‘Nationalism’: An Essay on Vaikunda Swamy Cult,” Studies in History 8/2 [July-December, 1992], 179.
[29]R. Ponnu, Sri Vaikunda Swamigal and the Struggle for Social Equality in South India, [Madurai: Ram Publishers, 2000], 66.
[30] M.S.S. Pandian, “Meanings of ‘Colonialism’ and ‘Nationalism’: An Essay on Vaikunda Swamy Cult,” Studies in History 8/2 [July-December, 1992], 179.
[31]R. Ponnu, Sri Vaikunda Swamigal and the Struggle for Social Equality in South India, [Madurai: Ram Publishers, 2000], 56-57.
[32] R. Ponnu, Sri Vaikunda Swamigal and the Struggle for Social Equality in South India, [Madurai: Ram Publishers, 2000], 57-58.
[33] M.S.S. Pandian, “Meanings of ‘Colonialism’ and ‘Nationalism’: An Essay on Vaikunda Swamy Cult,” Studies in History 8/2 [July-December, 1992], 179-180.
[34] N. Elango and Vijaya Shanthi Elango claims that it was a kind of penance initiated by Vaikuntar that which the followers are obliged to practice, Cf, N. Elango & Vijaya Shanthi Elango, Ayya Vaikuntar: The Light of the World, op.cit., 13.
[35] M.S.S. Pandian, “Meanings of ‘Colonialism’ and ‘Nationalism’: An Essay on Vaikunda Swamy Cult,” Studies in History 8/2 [July-December, 1992], 180.Cf. also, N. Elango & Vijaya Shanthi Elango, Ayya Vaikuntar: The Light of the World, op.cit., 13.
[36] N. Elango & Vijaya Shanthi Elango, Ayya Vaikuntar: The Light of the World, op.cit., 13.
[37]N. Elango & Vijaya Shanthi Elango, Ayya Vaikuntar: The Light of the World, op.cit., 13.  Cf also., R. Ponnu, Sri Vaikunda Swamigal and the Struggle for Social Equality in South India, [Madurai: Ram Publishers, 2000], 58-59.
[38] N. Elango & Vijaya Shanthi Elango, Ayya Vaikuntar: The Light of the World [Theru: Jeya Press, 1997], 38.
[39] N. Elango & Vijaya Shanthi Elango, Ayya Vaikuntar: The Light of the World [Theru: Jeya Press, 1997], 39.
[40]R. Ponnu, Sri Vaikunda Swamigal and the Struggle for Social Equality in South India, [Madurai: Ram Publishers, 2000], 64-65.
[41]R. Ponnu, Sri Vaikunda Swamigal and the Struggle for Social Equality in South India, [Madurai: Ram Publishers, 2000], 62.
[42]R. Ponnu, Sri Vaikunda Swamigal and the Struggle for Social Equality in South India, [Madurai: Ram Publishers, 2000], 62-63.
[43]R. Ponnu, Sri Vaikunda Swamigal and the Struggle for Social Equality in South India, [Madurai: Ram Publishers, 2000], 68-69.
[44] K.K. Pillai, The Sucindram Temple [Madras:n.p., 1953], 265.
[45]R. Ponnu, Sri Vaikunda Swamigal and the Struggle for Social Equality in South India, [Madurai: Ram Publishers, 2000], 69-70.
[46]Ivy Peter and D. Peter, Samaya Thondarkalum Samudaya Marumalarchium[Tamil], [Nagercoil: Kanyakumari Institue of Development Studies, 1999], p.60; NagaaaaaaaaAiya, V., op,cit., 25-29; R.N. Yesudas, op.cit., 5, 30-31; Ward & Connor, op,cit., 102-104;C.M. Agur, Church History of
Travancore
[Madras:n.p., 1903], 573-586.
[47]R. Ponnu, Sri Vaikunda Swamigal and the Struggle for Social Equality in South India, [Madurai: Ram Publishers, 2000], 40.; M.S.S. Pandian, “Meanings of ‘Colonialism’ and ‘Nationalism’: An Essay on Vaikunda Swamy Cult,” Studies in History 8/2 [July-December, 1992], 177;  N. Elango & Vijaya Shanthi Elango, Ayya Vaikuntar: The Light of the World [Theru: Jeya Press, 1997], 5; K. Pachaimal, Ahilam Vasana Kaaviyam[Nagercoil: Krishna Press, 1971], ix; N. Vivekanandan, Ahilatlurattu Ammanai: Moolamum Uraium Part-I [Nagercoil: Vicekananda Publishers, 2003], xiv.
[48]R. Ponnu, Sri Vaikunda Swamigal and the Struggle for Social Equality in South India, [Madurai: Ram Publishers, 2000], 100.
[49]R. Ponnu, Sri Vaikunda Swamigal and the Struggle for Social Equality in South India, [Madurai: Ram Publishers, 2000], 102.
[50]R. Ponnu, Sri Vaikunda Swamigal and the Struggle for Social Equality in South India, [Madurai: Ram Publishers, 2000], 103.
[51]M.S.S. Pandian, “Meanings of ‘Colonialism’ and ‘Nationalism’: An Essay on Vaikunda Swamy Cult,” Studies in History 8/2 [July-December, 1992], 180.
[52]R. Ponnu, Sri Vaikunda Swamigal and the Struggle for Social Equality in South India, [Madurai: Ram Publishers, 2000], 53-54.
[53] M.S.S. Pandian, “Meanings of ‘Colonialism’ and ‘Nationalism’: An Essay on Vaikunda Swamy Cult,” Studies in History 8/2 [July-December, 1992], 180.
[54] N. Elango & Vijaya Shanthi Elango, Ayya Vaikuntar: The Light of the World [Theru: Jeya Press, 1997], 8.
[55]M.S.S. Pandian, “Meanings of ‘Colonialism’ and ‘Nationalism’: An Essay on Vaikunda Swamy Cult,” Studies in History 8/2 [July-December, 1992], 181.
[56] N. Elango & Vijaya Shanthi Elango, Ayya Vaikuntar: The Light of the World [Theru: Jeya Press, 1997], 14.
[57]M.S.S. Pandian, “Meanings of ‘Colonialism’ and ‘Nationalism’: An Essay on Vaikunda Swamy Cult,” Studies in History 8/2 [July-December, 1992], 181. Cf.also., R. Ponnu, Sri Vaikunda Swamigal and the Struggle for Social Equality in South India, [Madurai: Ram Publishers, 2000], 55-56.
[58]R. Ponnu, Sri Vaikunda Swamigal and the Struggle for Social Equality in South India, [Madurai: Ram Publishers, 2000], 54-55.
[59]Interview with Bala Prajapati on 10.01.2006.
[60]Interview with N. elango on 10.01.2006.
[61] M.S.S. Pandian, “Meanings of ‘Colonialism’ and ‘Nationalism’: An Essay on Vaikunda Swamy Cult,” Studies in History 8/2 [July-December, 1992], 181.
[62]R. Ponnu, Sri Vaikunda Swamigal and the Struggle for Social Equality in South India, [Madurai: Ram Publishers, 2000], 60-61.Cf also., S.M.L. Lamshmana Chettiar, Folklore in Tamil Nadu [New Delhi: n.p., 1973], 28.
[63]R. Ponnu, Sri Vaikunda Swamigal and the Struggle for Social Equality in South India, [Madurai: Ram Publishers, 2000], 61-62. Cf als., Samuel Mateer, Native Life in Travancore [London: n.d., 1871], 203-208.
[64]Samuel Mateer, Native Life in Travancore [London: n.d., 1871], 112.
[65]R. Ponnu, Sri Vaikunda Swamigal and the Struggle for Social Equality in South India, [Madurai: Ram Publishers, 2000], 75.
[66]R. Ponnu, Sri Vaikunda Swamigal and the Struggle for Social Equality in South India, [Madurai: Ram Publishers, 2000], 62.
[67]R. Harigopalan, Ahilathirattu Ammanai[Nagercoil: Aiyya Vaikuntar Thirukudumba Pathippagam, 2000], 253.

Ahmadiya Movement

Ahmadiyas of Qadian
It arose in the Punjab in the eighties as reaction mission works (arguments), , onslaught of Dayananda and against Aligar reforms.
  Often Christians exposed the weakness of Islam
Qadian was a place in the Gurdaspur District of Punjab.
The founder, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was born and taught between 1879 and 1908.
His was ancient Muhammadan family attached to mysticism of Islam (Sufism).
 He claimed that he was the Christian Messiah, Muhammadan Mahadi, final avatara of Hindus. i.e. he came for the regeneration of the three nations- Hindu, Muslim and Christian.
Wanted to show that in him Christianity and Islam  unite and culminate.
This is difficult to accept because the Mahadi is a man of blood and Christ is entirely different.
He claimed that he was not Jesus Christ returned but came in the spirit and power of Jesus Christ.
His main argument was that Jesus did not die on the cross. He did not rise from the dead and did not ascend to heaven. Jesus died a natural death.
But the gospels were deliberately corrupted by the Christians.
The swoon theory: Jesus was not dead on the cross but was in the state of swoon. He died in Cashmere.
He was on the cross only for a few hours. His legs were not broken. Jesus himself said ‘why seek ye the living among the dead’.
Jesus appeared to his disciples as living man not as disembodied  spirit. Jesus himself used Jonah’s example.
Mirza quotes the so-called Gospel of Barnabas , a mediaeval Muhammadan forgery- Jesus did not die on the cross.
Ointment of Jesus: it was called Marham-I –Isa. It was a powerful medicine that heals and removes the scars. Jesus recovered from the tomb after three days. The cool atmosphere in the tomb was favourable to Jesus. Thus after three days Jesus recovered from his swoon. The disciples applied the wonderful ointment.  Jesus was entirely healed and ready for foreign travel.
In 1889 a Russian, Nicolas Notovitch  traveled through Kashmire to Leh in Ladak. He spent time with Buddhist Lamas of the monastery of Himis. Seven years he published a book. It was mentioned there that the abbot of the monastery read him an ancient MS. According to it in the interval between Jesus’ visit to the temple of Jerusalem at the age of twelve  and his baptism by John travelled from Palestine to India ans studied under the Jains, Buddhists and Hindus of those days. Thus he travelled to india after crucifixion.
The meaning of the Ascension:
Jesus was separated from his disciples in order to preach in Afghanistan and cashmere to the ten lost tribes.
In Khan Yar Street , Srinagar, Cashmere there was a tomb of Yus Asaf. Yus is corruption of Yasu i.e. Jesus.
Asaf from Hebrew . asaf meaning ‘gatherer i.e. of the ten lost tribes of Israel.
According to him Christianity is spirituality dead that is why Jesus did not return.
Arguments in support of his Messiahship
Second coming of Elijah was fulfilled in John the Baptist, who was not Elijah.
 Likewise the second coming of Christ will be fulfilled not by a personal return of Jesus, but by the appearance of one coming in the spirit and power of Jesus.
Mirza claimed that the prophecy in John 16:7 refers to him. i.e. Nevertheless I tell you the truth: it is to your advantage that I go away, for if I do not go away, the Advocate[a] will not come to you; but if I go, I will send him to you.
Millennium calculation of his own
For him the first millennium is the millennium of the devil’s imprisonment . Muhammad appeared.
Second is the millennium of devil’s freedom. This was the time Islam declined and there was growth of evil.
The third millennium is the millennium of the Kingdom of God. That is why he himself has come.
Miracles: miracles are only symbolic language
He predicted the death of no less than one hundred and twenty one persons. He also predicted the birth of many. As most of his prediction were incorrect, on the 24th February 1899, the Government of Punjab issued an order, ordering him to cease making such prophecies.
 He rejected virgin birth.
Questioned the divinity and superiority of Jesus to Muhammed.
Jesus was a sinner because: he took baptism. He underwent temptation. Jesus himself told why call me good?
They are not accepts in Pakistan  as Muslims
Their main work is conversion through arguments.
He claimed to be the second Adam
Claimed to be greater than Christ- because was associated with drunkenness and less philanthropy.
He condemned  tomb worship.  Opposed Jihad, religious fanatics, bloody Mahdi
He opposed Christianity. He founded a high school. Edited two papers- Al Hakam and Review of religions
He also published tracts.
In Mirza parallel to Persian Bahism is striking.
He died 1908
His successor was Hakim-ud-Din.
After the death the Mirza there were two groups. One accepted him as prohet. The other did not.